24 Plus News – Politics & Financial Rotating Header Image

Scottish Conservatives highlight the plight of Carers and concern for the Elderly

It has long been recognised by communities that carers across the age spectrum need more support. Council funding cut backs have directly affected the ability of many charitable organisations to deliver crucial services at the front end. Their struggle to survive has been well documented.
Mary Scanlon MSP and Councillor Douglas Ross demonstrate continued interest and involvement with the dedicated groups striving to make a difference.

Local Councillor and MSP support Moray Carers’ Project


Mary Scanlon, Scottish Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands and Douglas Ross, Scottish Conservative Councillor for Fochabers-Lhanbryde demonstrated their support for unpaid carers and young carers when they visited The Princess Royal Trust for Carers Moray Carers’ Project in Elgin on Monday.

Mary and Douglas heard about the work being done by staff at the Project to provide practical support to unpaid carers, and the innovative work being done in Moray’s schools to help identify young carers who balance education and learning whilst providing often intensive levels of care for parents, or other family members. The Young Carers team work closely with secondary schools and are building some initial links with primary schools in Moray to offer one to one support to pupils who also have a caring role, whilst raising awareness of young carers and the issues they face with teachers and other professionals.

The project has recently been awarded £50,000 from the Long Term Conditions Alliance to develop a Digital Storytelling project, which will enable the Project to develop a resource which can be used to raise awareness of carers and young carers amongst professionals and the wider public. The team hopes that this new award will enable them to continue developing carers’ services whilst helping to maintain the long term future of the Project through a social enterprise venture.  Mary has submitted a motion on this in the Scottish Parliament which has received cross-party support.

Douglas and Mary congratulated the staff at Moray Carers’ Project on their work and their success in securing this new award.  Both heard about the considerable financial challenges facing Moray Carers’ Project, particularly the Young Carers’ Service, which only has funding until summer 2010.

Mary Scanlon said:
“Unpaid carers do tremendous work and it was encouraging to see what is being done in Moray and in particular the efforts made to assist young carers.  The stress and strain placed upon a carer of any age can be immense but for a younger person, when combined with school work and trying to socialise with their friends, the pressure is often far greater.”

“The upcoming Young Carers’ Strategy will look to ensure that young carers are identified and adequately supported and I think it is important that the good work which is currently being done to achieve this in Moray continues.”

Douglas Ross added:
“The last year has seen changes to carers services in Moray but I have now met with both Quarriers and the Moray Carers’ Project and it is clear there is an enthusiasm for both organisations to work together for the good of carers in Moray.

“While the providers supporting carers in Moray have changed, the needs of the carers have not.  Only with the right assistance can young carers continue with their excellent work while also living their own life and that is why we have to ensure the support is in place for them across Moray.”

Conservative MSP, Mary Scanlon has submitted the following Motion to the Scottish Parliament:
S3M-05893 Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party): Congratulations to Moray Carers’ Project

That the Parliament congratulates Moray Carers’ Project, part of the Princess Royal Trust for Carers Network, on its recent £50,000 award from the Long-Term Conditions Alliance; considers that this award will enable it to further develop support for unpaid carers in Moray; notes that through the appointment of a digital storyteller the project will be able to produce films in which carers share their experience, concerns and needs, and believes that this will have a number of outcomes, including the creation of a resource that can be used to raise carer awareness among professionals and the wider public, while supporting the sustainability of the project through a possible social enterprise venture.

Additional information about carers in Moray and Scotland.
There are approximately 100,000 young carers in Scotland who provide emotional and practical support to loved ones who could not manage without their help because of illness, frailty, disability, mental health or addiction problems. Carers can be of any age and come from any background. In Scotland, carers save the Scottish Government some £7.6 billion a year, but they often give up jobs and pensions to look after the ones they love.  There are over 11,600 unpaid carers in Moray.

Moray Carers Project is affiliated to The Princess Royal Trust for Carers is the largest provider of comprehensive carers support services in the UK. Through its unique network of independently managed Carers’ Centres and interactive websites – www.carers.org and www.youngcarers.net – The Trust currently provides quality information, advice and support services to carers of all ages and backgrounds.

There are 29 Carers’ Centres throughout Scotland, delivering services in almost all local authority areas from Orkney to the Borders. Moray is one of those centres and has been in existence for almost 10 years, providing expert and tailored advice and support to unpaid carers and young carers in Moray.

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

Election Date Speculation

No surprises.  Gordon Brown will no doubt announce the Election for May 6th.
The Prime Minister and his MP’s realise they could loose this election and want to ensure their pension contributions are at maxium levels!
A fudged Budget with very clever wording and no real content to try and appease the electorate into believing they are the responsible Party to take the country forward into the next few years.
Unfortunately their record says differently.  This Labour Government has done more damage to the British Economy than any previous Government.
They took the helm with a healthy bank balance and now we are trillions in debt!!
Do they think the electorate are all fools?

Budget Date Fuels Election Speculation

5:46pm UK, Wednesday March 10, 2010

Ruth Barnett, Sky News Online
Gordon Brown has confirmed there will be a budget in two weeks’ time, adding weight to speculation there will be an election on May 6.

In a written statement, Chancellor Alistair Darling announced it would be held on March 24.

The date makes it likely there will be a General Election on the same day as the local polls.

Mr Brown made the announcement in a speech on the economy.

Earlier, Treasury officials declined to comment on the date but said it would be released in a written ministerial statement to MPs.

Sky’s political correspondent Joey Jones said it is likely to be a “nakedly political” budget, “dripping with electoral menace”.

You can’t tell us ‘my policies are working, stick with me,’ when quite patently they’re not.

George Osborne attacks the Government’s record

It may lack substance as Mr Darling has already set out some of Labour’s plans for the economy and may not want to reveal more detail before the campaign begins, Jones added.

Both major parties are under pressure to set out how and when they will tackle the deficit.

The annual rate of borrowing is expected to reach about £178bn this year – an all-time high.

Mr Darling has said he will more than halve the deficit in four years.

But Tory leader David Cameron and shadow chancellor George Osborne insist the Government is putting growth and interest rates at risk by not making cuts immediately.

Mr Osborne told Sky News he feared there would be “nothing new of substance to really reassure the business community,” in the budget.

The Government cannot “have it both ways, you can’t tell us ‘my policies are working, stick with me,’ when quite patently they’re not,” he added.

Mr Brown has been pinning his hopes, at least in part, on the economy bouncing back strongly from the recession in the early months of 2010.

He has warned that severe cuts, introduced too soon, would put the “fragile” recovery at risk.

Crucial GDP figures are expected in late April

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

New UK Borders Sytem Not Credible

This will NOT stop terrorism or criminality any more than ID Cards would have done.  These individuals will always find other ways around the system.
No doubt another EU directive and a waste of public monies.

Frosty Welcome For UK Electronic Borders Plan

8:39am UK, Thursday March 11, 2010

Mark White, Sky News home affairs correspondent
Government claims over the roll-out of its new electronic border controls are “not credible”, according to opposition parties and some travel operators.

Ministers have said the e-Borders system will monitor 95% of passenger movements by the end of this year, but Eurostar and the ferry companies have told Sky News they have not even reached agreement with the UK Border Agency over a system of electronic checks which would be workable.

For the Government, e-Borders is the front line in the battle to keep the UK safe from terrorism, criminality and illegal immigration.

It works by electronically storing and checking the details of passengers against official watch lists.

Since going live in May 2009, more than 2,000 wanted people have been arrested at UK airports – 10 murder suspects were detained and almost 40 people arrested on suspicion of serious sexual assaults or rapes.

About half of all passenger movements are monitored by e-Borders now

It is terrorism watch lists which are a top priority for e-Borders and the government says there have been “significant counter-terror interventions” since the system went live.

But currently, only half of all passenger movements are monitored by e-Borders.

The Government has stated that all passenger traffic will be monitored under the system by 2014, with 95% monitored by the end of this year.

Tim Reardon, from the Chamber of Shipping, represents the ferry companies – who carry more than 20 million passengers in and out of UK ports each year.

He told Sky the current system would cause enormous disruption for ferry passengers: “The e-Borders system as the Government has proposed it offers the nasty prospect of extra hassle and extra cost to passengers, for no benefit whatsoever.”

Of the programme for implementation, Mr Reardon said: “There’s no prospect at all of that happening within the timescale that the Government has suggested. They have suggested that it will happen by the end of this year. It won’t.”

The e-Borders programme has also run into legal difficulties, with the European Commission ruling late last year that passengers within the EU cannot be forced to give advance details and any such scheme within EU borders would have to be done on a voluntary basis.

Conservative shadow immigration minister Damien Green said: “I think the e-Borders programme has proved an expensive fiasco. Britain desperately needs a proper way of counting people in and out of the country.

“We’ve had four years of the e-Borders programme and we’ve only hit 45% coverage and the Government is claiming that by the end of this year we will have hit about 95%. I think that claim is just not credible.”

But despite the difficulties, the government is pushing ahead with the scheme.

Home secretary Alan Johnson is to open a new control hub in Manchester that will collect, store and process millions of passenger details each month, checking them against official watch lists.

Ministers insist it is a system which has played, and will continue to play, a significant role in securing the UK’s borders.

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

Alan Duncan MP: A Conservative Government would not only reform prisons but also address the underlying causes of our broken society which lead people to offend in the first place

DUNCAN ALAN NEW

Alan Duncan is a member of the shadow Justice team as shadow minister for prisons and probation.

Prison reform by reducing reoffending is an area where a changed Conservative Party intends to make a massive difference.

Some progress has been made in the last thirteen years, but still our prisons are on the brink of crisis.  The Government recently announced the end of its reckless early release scheme – apparently having been advised that it would have to be re-introduced after the election. It is the irresponsible action of a government that has long put political expediency ahead of the national interest. But there is an even deeper problem at the heart of the prison estate.  The ideal of a criminal justice system which makes any significant contribution to reducing reoffending is a long way off.

Every year over 300,000 offences are committed by those released from prison during just the year before; and half of all crime is committed by those who have already been through the criminal justice system.  Too many prisoners are simply going in and out and in again.  It is a disturbing waste of lives and money, and has no place in a modern, civilised Britain.

I found myself in Peterborough and Holloway prisons last week.  The staff at both work very hard, but it was also clear that a prison can only be as good as the flaws in the system allow: overcrowding across the prison estate means around 200 of Peterborough’s prisoners are actually from London, cut off from their families and future employers; a lack of diversion into proper treatment means 70% of prisoners have two or more mental disorders; a country plagued by drug abuse, and again, a lack of diversion into proper treatment, means the young mother I met in HMP Holloway and her 3-month-old baby are both behind bars; no support post-release and no job to go to had led Susan, another prisoner, to complete a sentence for shoplifting, only to be released and do it all over again.  The depressing examples are endless.

Yet failings are easy to moan about, particularly when solutions are hard to identify and implement. Change will of course be difficult, and require tremendous political will, but we can and must try.  Reducing reoffending is our aim above all, and to achieve it we need a rehabilitation revolution both in and outside prison – before, during and after custody.

By the time an offender reaches prison, the damage is already done – both to victim and offender.  So firstly, I want much greater attention paid to troubling behaviour before it develops.  We must also address the underlying causes of our broken society: stop the 48% of prisoners who ran away from home as a child; train the 60% who had no qualifications prior to imprisonment; employ the 67% who had no job; house the 32% who were homeless; and help the 50% who were hazardous drinkers. When it comes to sentencing, the system should help the victim and offender – not confuse both.  We will end automatic release halfway through a sentence, so that victims do not feel cheated; and introduce “min-max” sentencing so prisoners, prisons and the public know what they are getting.

Inside, prisons should be a hive of activity, with prison officers, the voluntary sector, and the private sector harnessed to revolutionise prisons into centres of real rehabilitation, education, training, and work.  I want busy prisons where ‘purposeful activity’ is not measured by when a prisoner steps out of his cell, but by when the 4 out of 5 prisoners who currently cannot do so learn to fill in a job application form, when they acquire a transferable skill, or complete an apprenticeship. We must also incentivise prisoners through a system of ‘earned release’, so their sentence end can be brought forward from the maximum through engagement in rehabilitative programmes and demonstration of a real desire to reform.  Doing little or nothing with prisoners while inside protects the public for the period of their incarceration, but increases the risk to society when they are released.

What happens after prison is of the utmost importance.  For if we spit out disorientated prisoners, with little notice, even less training, no job, no money, and no home, we are setting them up to fall off the cliff edge.  We need a consistent release process rather than the current ad hoc response to overcrowding, for which prisons, probation and prisoners cannot plan.  Eventually, we also want to see all offenders met at the gate – not by their local drug dealer, but by a member of the voluntary, private or public sector, perhaps paid by results for the prevention of their reoffending.

To bring this all together and make it work, we are going to need something leaner, less bureaucratic, and more effective than the leviathan that is the current NOMS.  The one consistency in the system today is that from the moment of the crime, to the end of a prisoner’s time, there is nothing consistent or coordinated about an offender’s management.  The system cries out for the local control of offenders, supporting their rehabilitation along the path from conviction to post-release, and coordinating all the fragmented efforts which alone will struggle, but together will thrive.

Reducing repeat offending is a crucial part of mending broken Britain.

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

Nick Clegg fears Liberal Democrats will split if he backs minority Tory government

Nick Clegg may keep labour in power – ONLY the Conservatives will end Labour rule!

6a00d83451b31c69e20120a7a68c93970b-800wi

In his Saturday column Peter Oborne lists three reasons why Nick Clegg is likely to manoeuvre his party into a deal with Labour if there is a hung parliament:

  1. “Clegg has discovered (rather to his personal dismay) that most of his party regard any kind of agreement with the Conservatives with disgust. This feeling is so overwhelming that Clegg fears that a Lib/Tory pact might actually split his party.
  2. Second, Clegg believes LibDem and Tory policies are utterly incompatible. The key ‘red line’ is the economy. On the one hand, the LibDems are bitterly opposed to cutting spending immediately after the election, fearing that it would imperil Britain’s fragile economic recovery.  However, Tory shadow chancellor George Osborne has already said he would slash the out-of-control budget deficit, starting with an emergency budget within weeks of the election.
  3. Third, the LibDems have been seduced by Brown’s clever promise of electoral reform. The Prime Minister has long been opposed to proportional representation (because he believes it leads to weak governments), but he has softened his stance in a cynical ploy to cosy up to the LibDems.”

Tim Montgomerie

> The Liberal Democrats set out their four demands for keeping a minority government in power

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

Guess what? The unions are spending more in the marginals than the Conservatives

6a00d83451b31c69e20128765eaa5d970c-800wi


This from Ian Kirby
, the News of the World’s Political Editor (my emphasis):

“A highly confidential operation being run by Britain’s biggest trade union, Unite, is far bigger than the Tories’ own £3m marginal seats campaign. The union is using it’s own massive datatbase of members in a bid to persuade dithering former Labour voters they must get out and vote during the General Election. The swing voters are being called by activists working for the Union…

…The operation is being masterminded by Charlie Whelan, Unite’s Political Director and a close friend of Prime Minister Gordon Brown…

…at the moment Labour have about £8m to spend at the election, half of the Tories’ own General Election Budget. But Unite are likely to spend up to £5m on their own campaign before the General Election starts. The trade unions have sent a staggering £88.5million to the Labour Party HQ in the last eight years. This amounts to 63 per cent of all funding the Labour Party has received since official records of donations began in 2001. They are also providing teams of drivers across the country to transport the elderly to polling stations, they are organizing postal votes, and sending 200 campaign officials to the marginal seats….

…To reinforce the direct calls, letters and leaflets, the Labour Party is also planning poster campaigns that will highlight claims about cuts under a Tory Government. For the past six months, Labour MPs have bombarded government departments such as the Home Office, Department for Children, Schools and Families and the Department of Health. They have been asking about the effect of budget cuts on their constituencies. Those answers will be used on posters which will claim the Tories will cut hundreds of front line police jobs, thousands of nurses and teachers. Labour strategists believe the campaign will be particularly effective in the North West, where a far higher proportion of potential labour voters are in public sector jobs.”

Perhaps we’ll now get a week of stories on the BBC about Labour being in debt to the trade union movement. Or perhaps we won’t.

Tim Montgomerie

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis

Good government costs less with the Conservatives – David Cameron

David Cameron

Rt Hon David Cameron MP,
Saturday, March 6 2010

It’s great to be back in Wales. It’s four years since I first addressed this conference. Back then we were just a footnote in Welsh politics. And just look at what we’ve done since then.

We’ve won council seats in Denbighshire, in Powys, in Pembrokeshire. We’re running councils in Monmouthshire and the Vale of Glamorgan.

We’ve got over sixty more councillors in cities, towns and villages and even in Labour’s heartland, and yes, even deep in the valleys, even in the Rhonda let’s not forget Joel James – he may be the only Conservative in the village but were proud of the progress we’ve made.

And four years ago, who would have thought that the Conservative Party could top the poll in Wales beating Labour for the first time since the First World War, like we did in last year’s European elections? Forget ‘how green was my valley’ it should be ‘how blue is my valley’ because the great dragon of Welsh Conservatism has awoken once more. So I want to thank you for everything you’ve done.  And I especially want to thank Cheryl and Nick. You have dedicated yourselves to our revival in Wales. You have led our campaigns from the front. And you should both feel incredibly proud of what you have achieved.

FIVE MORE YEARS

Yes, you’ve all been working hard. But today I’m here to ask you to double your efforts. That general election is just over sixty days away. This isn’t an election that it would be quite nice to win. It is an election it is absolutely essential we win because our country is in a complete mess and we have to turn it around.  Everyone knows five more years of Gordon Brown would be a disaster for this country.  Another five years of his spending, bloat, waste, debt and taxes. Another five years of failing to get to grips with our big social problems. Another five years in our politics of that big, top-down, bossy “I know best” sort of approach.

That’s why the choice at the next election is as simple as this:  Five more years of Gordon Brown’s tired government making things worse or change with the Conservatives, who have the energy, leadership and values to get the country moving again.  Change in our economy, backing aspiration and opportunity and aspiration for all. Change in our society, encouraging responsibility and backing those who do the right thing. And change in our politics, giving people more power and control over their lives

THE CHOICE IN WALES

And Wales needs that change as much as anywhere else in Britain. In fact, I’d argue it needs it even more. Do you know what Peter Hain said last month?  He said “compared with Rwanda…Wales is indeed still a wealthy country”.  Now, I’ve been to Rwanda and it’s a beautiful place.  And I’m proud that Conservative Party volunteers have been there to help out in social action projects.

But what does it say about this Government – and these Ministers – when they compare Wales to the 17th poorest country on the planet?  What does it say about this Government – and these Ministers – when the scale of their ambitions for Wales do not seem to go beyond a country that in the last twenty years has been ravaged by war and genocide?  What does it say about this Government – and these Ministers – when they think the Welsh should put up with this and just be thankful for what they get?

I tell you what it says.  It says this Government is arrogant, out-of-touch and has completely lost any right to govern.  So at this election, I want you to show your real passion and anger at how Labour have let down Wales.  Because there is a simple fact about what’s happened here in the past decade.  There’s not just a border separating Wales and the rest of the UK – there’s a prosperity gap.   And under Labour it’s got deeper and wider.  This is the poorest nation on these islands. It has the highest rates of unemployment and the highest rates of child poverty. There is only one word for what Labour have done in Wales this last decade: failure  and I don’t want you to let anyone forget it.   But more than that, I want you to tell the people of this great country that it doesn’t have to be like this.  Explain to them the real difference between Labour’s approach and the Conservative way.

Take the economy. Labour think you get the economy moving by opening up the big government toolbox, pulling out the old tools like regional development agencies and new initiatives and trying to crank it to life from on high.  We understand that in the end it’s not government that will get the Welsh economy growing it’s enterprise, it’s entrepreneurs, people with a great idea and the courage to start their own business. That’s why we’ll cut corporation tax rates, abolish taxes on the first ten jobs created by new businesses and get people off welfare and into work.

And look at our different approach to our biggest social problems. Labour say we’re wrong to talk about mending our broken society.  But when there are towns in Wales where one in five of the working age population live on benefits when one in ten are on some type of incapacity benefit when there are 140 violent crimes a day in this country when about 500 people in Wales die each year from alcohol  when so many children are deprived the structure of stable family life how can you pretend our society doesn’t need mending?  We need a government that’s going to face up to the facts, roll up their sleeves and get on with the job. That’s exactly what we’ll do. It’s our ambition to make Britain the most family-friendly country in Europe, by recognising marriage in the tax system, supporting couples in the benefits system and fighting back against crime.

And there is a massive difference in the way Labour and the Conservatives see our politics.   Labour see a system that is fundamentally sound but just needs a bit of tinkering to sort out the expenses scandal. We see a top-down, bossy, power-hoarding, unaccountable relic that needs to be re-built from the bottom up. Yes, we’ll sort out expenses – and we’ve been leading the way on that – but we need to go much further.We will give everyone in Wales a sense that they are in control of their own destiny. That’s why we’ll reduce the number of MPs, cut Whitehall bureaucracy by a third and make our politics more local, more transparent and more accountable.

That’s the difference between Labour and the Conservatives. Inaction vs action.  Defeat vs optimism. Despair for Wales vs hope for Wales. There’s no iron law that says Labour must win in Wales.  So at this election, I want you to get out there and fight, fight for our party and fight for the change we want bring above all, fight for Wales and fight for the future of Britain.

DEVOLUTION

But let me say this, whatever the outcome in Wales at the next election, we want a relationship of co-operation, not confrontation, between Westminster and Cardiff.  I will be a Prime Minister who acts on the voice of the Welsh people and will maintain strong relationships with the Assembly Government.  That’s why I’m happy to come to the Assembly each year and make myself available to answer questions on any subject.  It’s why I want Westminster Ministers appearing in front of Assembly committees – and Assembly Ministers appearing in front of Westminster committees.  And it’s why I will always support devolution and make sure it works for the benefit of everyone. And if people in Wales want a referendum on full law-making powers that is a matter for them – so a Conservative Government will not block it.  But let’s resolve right here and right now that we will be the ones who stop the endless round of arguments that too often block progress in Wales – and start working together to build this country’s future.

THE BIG QUESTION IN POLITICS

But today I don’t just want to talk to you about how we can secure the future of Wales, I want to set out how we can secure the future of the United Kingdom itself. The greatest task of all will be getting to grips with the monster budget deficit that Labour have created. I think people know by now that the Conservatives are the ones with the grit and the guts to cut public spending to cut the deficit. We’ve been upfront that there will have to be cuts, upfront about where they will come and upfront that they will have to start straightaway. And people say ‘yes, we agree with the Conservatives when they say they want to cut the deficit.’ But when we also talk about our big ambitions to reform schools, shake-up welfare, help the poorest in society, they can sometimes think: “hang on a minute, how are you going to make this country better at the same time as dealing with these massive debts?” They’re right to ask – because their question goes to the heart of the big argument in British politics today.

At the last few elections, according to Labour the big question in politics was: “who do you trust to spend some more of your money?” That was Gordon Brown’s question.  Well I’ve a message for you, Gordon: it’s over. There isn’t any money left. You’ve spent it all. No, the question today is this: “how do we make things better without just spending money?” This is the question that will define British politics for the years to come and today, I want to show you how it’s only the modern Conservative Party that has the answers.

BIG SPENDING FAILS

We’ve always known that you don’t improve things by just spending more money on them.  For years now at Prime Minister’s Questions I’ve faced Gordon Brown – and Tony Blair before him – droning on about resources going up, spending going up, investment going up…all to cheers from the Labour benches.   They were always less forthcoming about what that money had actually bought.  Social mobility,  Stagnant.  Inequality, rising.  Hundreds of thousands more living in severe poverty.  They thought it was all about money.  It wasn’t. And no there is no money left there is nothing left to say. Labour never understand that it’s not the numbers on the government cheque that count but the number of people who are lifted out of poverty; who get a chance in life; who get helped or cured or taught or given the opportunity to live their dream …. that’s what it’s about.

MORE FOR LESS

So after all this waste, all this failure and now all this debt, it falls to us, the modern Conservative Party, to restore hope in all those Labour have let down.  Showing government can be smarter, better, more imaginative and more competent.  Explaining how we can make things better without just spending money, how we can deliver more for less.  More for less is not some pie-in-the-sky political promise.  It’s something that businesses up and down the country do day-in, day-out.  They think: how can I deliver more for my customers while reducing my costs?  Imagine if they took the Labour approach, believing that every reduction in spending and costs was automatically a calamity for their customers.

Think of the advertising.  Good food costs more at Sainsburys.  Not “Every little helps” from Tesco, but “Every little Hurts”.  Businesses are constantly looking for creative ways to get more bang for their buck.  Reforming work practices. Buying wholesale when they can. Eradicating duplication. Innovating new delivery systems. Cutting out waste.  We need to bring that business sense and imagination to government.

Let me make clear: we are not offering a simple efficiency drive. We’re not promising that the path to less spending and better public services is paved with just a few well-chosen cuts. What we propose is something entirely different – something so bold and radical I would call it a whole new type of government.  Where it spends money, how it spends money, the way it spends money – that’s all got to change. We’re going to shape government in a way it has never existed before so we use our instincts as Conservatives, our understanding of how people and communities really work and the latest technology to deliver more for less.

And this means doing three things in particular: First, tackling the root causes of our social problems so that we can make millions of lives better while at the same time reducing the costs on the state.  Second, reforming our public services so we deliver both choice and efficiency.  And third, making government more local and more transparent so we cut waste as well as improve outcomes.  Let me take each in turn.

REDUCING THE DEMANDS ON THE STATE

First, reducing the long-term demands on the state.  In plain English that means asking the obvious question: why is public spending so high in the first place?  We spend so much on prisons because there is too much crime.  We spend so much on welfare because there are too many people not properly equipped for work.  We spend so much on health because our lifestyles are so unhealthy.  We need to rewind and ask: what are the causes of these things?  Do you know how much social breakdown costs our country each year?   Over £100 billion.  That’s one and a half thousand pounds for every person in our country. That money gets spent on the family that’s broken, the man who’s never known what it is to work, the child who’s growing up in desperate circumstances, the communities who live in fear of violence and crime  and it passes through our education system, our healthcare system, our criminal justice system, our care system, our welfare system.

Now just imagine if we got to grips with our social problems – gave everyone the hope that comes with work; every child the chance that comes with love; every community the purpose that comes with security. We would make life so much better for so many people. And we’d also massively reduce the bills for government. In other words, delivering more for less. The question is: how do we do that?

And here, there’s a real difference between our approach and Labour’s approach.  Labour’s approach is just to treat the symptoms of our big social problems by spending more money.  For example, when it comes to poverty they think a tax credit here or a benefit change there will make all the difference.  But all this does is keep people stuck in poverty while at the same time leaving the state with an ongoing role.  Our approach is to tackle the root causes of poverty, like welfare dependency, addiction, debt, poor schooling and above all, family breakdown, so the state is no longer so dominant.  That’s why we have put such focus on school reform, welfare reform and strengthening families, giving people the chance to lift themselves up and out of poverty, breaking the cycles that have existed for generations, and being the ones who will make British poverty history.

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

The second way we can deliver more for less is through reform of our public services.  In 2001 Gordon Brown said “there is not going to be one penny more until we get the changes” we need to reform our public services. But there’s been trillions of pennies since then – and where’s the reform?  It was blocked. By guess who? Gordon Brown.

He now poses as the champion of public service reform.  The truth is that he is to reforming public services what Nero was to fire safety or Tiger Woods to marital fidelity. Speak to doctors, nurses, teachers, police officers and they’ll tell you what a nightmare it is working in Labour’s bureaucratic state machine. They start out idealistic, they go into their training because they have a vocation, they have a love for what they do but that passion is being killed.  It’s death by a thousand tick boxes, targets, performance indicators, inspection regimes. They’re left feeling demoralised, disrespected, disillusioned.  Most of all they’re pulling their hair out because they see all that money being wasted and they know that it could be spent so much better. That’s why our reforms will all led by this common, clear Conservative principle:  Public services work better when they’re driven from the bottom-up, by people on the frontline.  So we’re going to take apart the centralised apparatus of command and control and we’re going to give that power to people who work in our public services – even going as far as giving them the chance to take complete ownership of the organisation they work for in.

We’ll also smash open the state monopoly and open the door to charities and private companies who can play a part in the public sector. And we’ll pay them all by the results they achieve. To those who say ‘you can’t do that’, I say ‘of course we can – and of course we must.’ Our reforms will unleash a new culture of public sector innovation, giving higher morale, better results, lower costs and – you’ve got it – more for less.

CUTTING WASTE

All these changes will have a profound impact on how much government spends. But the truth is it may take years to feel many of the benefits – and we can’t afford to wait that long. We need to start getting more for less from day one. So there is a third component to our plans – cutting out waste.  Labour’s spendaholic culture needs no introduction. This is the Government that has elevated money-burning to an art form. We’ve all got our own ridiculous Labour waste story.

Since 2003, this Government have paid out £10 million in tax credits – to people who are actually dead.  Then there’s an agency of the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills – they spent, and I promise this is true, £12,000 on branded golf balls. Or how about the Department for International Development?  They spent £240,000 on Brazilian dancing in London.  Here in Wales you had the huge upheaval of 22 health boards, launched to a great fanfare and scrapped just six years later.

And of course, no list of Labour waste can be complete without Ed Balls.  You don’t suffer his rule in Wales, but your taxes pay for it, so let me share this with you.  His Department for Children, Schools and Families reportedly spent £3 million on lavish new offices – which included a massage room and ‘contemplation suite’.   While we’re on that department, I found my own story this week.  Flicking through the Guardian I saw an advert they’d placed taking up a third of a page of prime-time space.  Sadly they weren’t advertising for a new Secretary of State.  They were asking people – and let me quote this accurately – ‘to put questions to the National Strategies about primary children’s writing.’  Leave aside the question of how you put a question to a strategy; just think of the bureaucratic carnival of waste behind an ad like this.   A group of civil servants emerge, presumably from the ‘contemplation suite’ with a novel idea.   They want to set up a taskforce for primary reading.  The taskforce books a weekend away to devise a strategy.  The strategy needs further thought so they hire consultants.  Then there’s the branding. The auditing. The monitoring. The strategy needs to be legally reviewed, peer reviewed, benchmarked, mentored and mainstreamed but not before there’s an allocation resources impact assessment.Then they call the communications department to create a website, design an ad and get it placed.

I could have saved them all that bother and all that money.  Writing is about the imagination.  What you need is some great teachers, some good books, some pencils and some paper. Is that really too difficult?  Now of course, the golf balls, the dancers, the lavish offices, the advertising campaigns – these are just the small examples of waste under Labour.  There have been monumental ones too.  The £4.5 billion spent – each year – on NHS bureaucracy.  That’s more than we spend on maternity and reproductive health.  The £3 billion lost in benefit fraud and error.  That’s more than we spend on winter fuel payments.   Every pound Labour waste is a pound that should be spent on keeping us safe, educating our children, improving our hospitals.  That’s why their spendaholic culture isn’t a diverting amusement or a mild irritation – it is a complete outrage and we will obliterate it.

I know there are those who will hear us talking about cut waste and say “you’ll be no different, you’ll have your pet projects, you’ll go native when you start living in the land of bureaucrats”.  So let me explain why we’ll be different.  We’ll be different because we are different.  First, our attitude is different.  Conservatives loathe waste.  Efficiency is in our DNA. We never forget that fundamental fact about public money, which is that it’s public, it’s yours, not ours. It doesn’t undergo some magical transformation at the Treasury to become government money.  Those are the same pounds that were earned by you on the factory floor, on the hospital ward, in the office and we will never forget that we have a moral duty not to spend your money but to save it where we can.

Second, our philosophy is different.  We don’t believe in top-down control; we believe in local control.  We don’t believe in taking power; we believe in giving it away.  And this will have a massive impact on our quest to cut out waste and deliver more for less.  It’s not just that a pound spent closer is a pound spent wiser – by those who really know the needs of a local community.  It’s also that a pound spent closer is a pound spent more efficiently – by those who have an interest in keeping costs down.

And third, our approach is different.  I don’t think people get quite how radical we propose to be.   The next Conservative government will be the first genuinely post-bureaucratic government in the world. We will ditch all the wasteful, costly, old-world bureaucratic methods and instead use post-bureaucratic tools.  And when it comes to cutting waste, nothing is more important to this agenda than transparency.  We’re going to publish every item of government spending over £25,000 online.   And we’re going to publish every government contract worth over £25,000 in full – every clause, every performance measure, every penalty trigger – too.

Think what this simple act of throwing things open will mean.  It will mean an army of ‘armchair auditors’ will be crawling all over the books, scrutinising them and acting as a straitjacket on wasteful spending.   It will mean the Minister who lazily signs off a monster contract without checking if he could get it cheaper will be caught out and will have to answer for their actions. It will mean that businesses and social enterprises can compete to offer better government services for less money. I defy anyone to call our plans of changing the way government works timid.  They are bold – and they will make a massive difference.  And they are why we can look the British people in the eye and say a Tory pound will go further than a Labour pound…that good government costs less with the Conservatives.

CONCLUSION

We know what we’re fighting for.  When you’re out there on the doorstep, when you’re writing a leaflet at 2am, when you’re pounding the streets for hours I want you to keep two pictures of Wales in your mind.

First, an image of Wales under Labour. Limping on with high unemployment, increasing child poverty and a government who puts this country in the same bracket as a developing nation. Then alongside that, a vision of Wales with a Conservative government. It would be a more confident Wales, with public spending under control and the deficit being cut.  A more prosperous Wales, with enterprise unleashed and jobs created. And a more family-friendly Wales, with marriage recognised in the tax system and parents given more time with their children.

These two visions of Wales are so far apart, but they come together in the polling booth with the real choice that people have at this election. It’s our job to keep explaining that choice for the next sixty days. Yes, we have a fight on our hands, but believe me – the Wales that would emerge from our victory – a confident, prosperous, family friendly Wales – will be worth it. So let’s get out there and win it.

Tweet this!Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes Fr
  • BlogMemes Sp
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • Current
  • Design Float
  • Diigo
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • eKudos
  • email
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • FriendFeed
  • FSDaily
  • Global Grind
  • Gwar
  • Haohao
  • HealthRanker
  • HelloTxt
  • Hemidemi
  • Identi.ca
  • IndianPad
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • laaik.it
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Meneame
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MSN Reporter
  • muti
  • MyShare
  • N4G
  • Netvibes
  • NuJIJ
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • ppnow
  • Print
  • Ratimarks
  • Rec6
  • RSS
  • Scoopeo
  • Segnalo
  • Simpy
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Symbaloo
  • ThisNext
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • Upnews
  • Webnews.de
  • Webride
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • Wists
  • Wykop
  • Xerpi
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg
  • HackerNews
  • Hyves
  • Posterous
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis